Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Video: Children thrive in Afghanistan orphanage

NBC/WSJ poll: Obama maintains lead, Romney within striking distance

On the eve of the first presidential debate, President Barack Obama maintains his national lead over Mitt Romney, but the Republican nominee is well within striking distance, according to the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40153870/vp/49249064#49249064

bachelorette penn state Ernie Els Teen Choice Awards 2012 Aurora victims usher James Holmes

Clearwater Communications, Incorporated- Newest Promotion ...

?

PRLog (Press Release) - Sep 30, 2012 -
Clearwater Communications, Incorporated recently promoted Meshak Faton to management!

Meshak Faton was born and raised in Benin, West Africa. Son of an entrepreneur who owned her own import and export business Meshak is an entrepreneur at heart. Meshak Faton graduated from Vincennes University with a Bachelor's degree in Business Administration, Marketing and Pre-Law. ?After graduating from Vincennes Meshak was going to pursue a law degree however, he responded to an online advertisement for a Manager Training Position with Clearwater Communications, Incorporated. Meshak was offered and accepted the position. Shortly after beginning work at Clearwater Meshak was promoted into a Leadership role and on September 17, 2012 Meshak Faton was promoted to Management. "When I began work at Clearwater I did not realize how fast I was able to work my way through the Management Training Program. I have learned so many valuable lessons both personally and professionally and I am excited to continue my career." Meshak Faton will be promoted to Partner within the next few weeks upon completion of his management training.

Clearwater Communications, Incorporated is extremely excited about the growth of the company and the direction the firm is heading.

Photo:
http://www.prlog.org/11987493/1

Source: http://www.prlog.org/11987493-clearwater-communications-incorporated-newest-promotion.html

tony robbins abraham lincoln vampire hunter their eyes were watching god lara logan manu ginobili sports illustrated swimsuit 2012 aretha franklin whitney houston

What's Actually Inside an Oil Filter?

October 1, 2012 4:30 PM

1. TAPPING PLATE


This serves as the entry and exit point for oil. Small holes around the edge facilitate the free flow of oil into the container. The threaded center hole is where the oil flows out and also how the container attaches to the engine.

2. ANTIDRAINBACK VALVE


Because the oil filter is typically located toward the middle or bottom of an engine, this rubber valve has a flap that blocks oil from draining back into the filter when the engine is off.

3. FILTER MEDIUM


The porous filter medium consists primarily of microscopic cellulose fibers along with synthetic fibers such as glass and polyester, which increase filtering efficiency and durability. The medium is also saturated with resin to give it strength and stiffness. Higher-grade filters have more synthetic fibers.

4. PLEATS


Folding the filter medium creates a greater total surface area. The number of pleats depends on the medium's thickness.

5. CENTER STEEL TUBE


The center tube provides structure and lets filtered oil return to the engine. The number, size, and position of the holes is key to ensuring that the oil flow is not restricted.

6. RELIEF VALVE


On a cold startup, oil can be too thick to filter. To prevent the engine from starving, the relief valve opens when the pressure builds enough to force the calibrated spring downward, allowing unfiltered oil into the center tube through the top.

7. END DISC


To keep unfiltered oil from leaking into the center tube, a fiber or metal end disc is bonded to each end of the filter medium. Some brands forgo discs and use a sealant to create solid ends.

8. RETAINER


A thin bit of metal that acts as a leaf spring, the retainer keeps the filter medium and end disc tight against the tapping plate.

Source: http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/how-to/products/whats-actually-inside-an-oil-filter-13272754?src=rss

shumpert hopkins hopkins dear john derrick rose torn acl pacers undrafted free agents

Monday, October 1, 2012

Boy Scouts to report pedophiles missed previously

FILE - This April 8, 2010 file photo shows Kelly Clark, attorney for the Portland man who filed a sex abuse lawsuit against the Boy Scouts of America, using a chart during his closing statements in the Multnomah County Courthouse in Portland, Ore. The Boy Scouts of America plan to begin doing what critics argue they should have done decades ago _ bring suspected abusers named in the organization?s so-called perversion files to the attention of police departments and sheriff?s offices across the country. (AP Photo/The Oregonian, Brent Wojahn, Pool, File)

FILE - This April 8, 2010 file photo shows Kelly Clark, attorney for the Portland man who filed a sex abuse lawsuit against the Boy Scouts of America, using a chart during his closing statements in the Multnomah County Courthouse in Portland, Ore. The Boy Scouts of America plan to begin doing what critics argue they should have done decades ago _ bring suspected abusers named in the organization?s so-called perversion files to the attention of police departments and sheriff?s offices across the country. (AP Photo/The Oregonian, Brent Wojahn, Pool, File)

(AP) ? The Boy Scouts of America plan to begin doing what critics argue they should have done decades ago ? bring suspected abusers named in the organization's so-called perversion files to the attention of police departments and sheriff's offices across the country.

The Scouts have, until now, argued they did all they could to prevent sex abuse within their ranks by spending a century tracking pedophiles and using those records to keep known sex offenders out of their organization. But a court-ordered release of the perversion files from 1965 to 1985, expected sometime in October, has prompted Scouts spokesman Deron Smith to say the organization will go back into the files and report any offenders who may have fallen through the cracks.

Smith said Mike Johnson, the group's youth protection director and a former police detective, will lead the review.

That could prompt a new round of criminal prosecutions for offenders who have so far escaped justice, said Clatsop County, Ore., District Attorney Josh Marquis. But investigations may require more than what most Scout files provide, including victims willing to cooperate.

"Let's even assume the suspect confessed," he said. "An uncorroborated confession is not sufficient for a conviction."

Many states have no statutes of limitations for children victimized when they were younger than 16, so even decades-old crimes could be fair game.

The Scouts began keeping the files shortly after their creation in 1910, when pedophilia was largely a crime dealt with privately ?not publicly. The organization argues that the files helped them track offenders and protect children. But some of the files released in 1991, detailing cases from 1971 to 1991, showed repeated instances of Scouts leaders failing to disclose sex abuse to authorities, even when they had a confession.

A lawsuit culminated in April 2010 with the jury ruling the BSA had failed to protect the plaintiff from a pedophile assistant Scoutmaster in the 1980s, even though that man had previously admitted molesting Scouts. The jury awarded $20 million to the plaintiff.

Files kept before 1971 remained secret, until a judge ruled ? and the Oregon Supreme Court agreed ? that they should be released. Attorneys are now redacting the addresses and other identifying material from the files, which stretch from 1965 to 1985.

The release means that alleged abusers, and the names of Scout leaders who failed to report them, will be made public soon in tens of thousands of pages of confidential documents __ one of the largest troves of the files the BSA has ever been forced to produce. A psychiatrist who reviewed the files, Dr. Jennifer Warren, found that police were involved in about two-thirds of the cases from 1965-1985.

Kelly Clark, a Portland attorney who won a landmark 2010 lawsuit against the Boy Scouts, says the documents show that even though the Scouts have been collecting the files nearly since the Boy Scouts' founding in 1910, the organization failed to use them to protect boys from pedophiles.

"What's significant is that the Boy Scouts could have these files for so long and not learn from them," Clark said.

Last week, the Scouts made public an internal report they compiled on the files by Warren, the psychiatrist who served as an expert witness for the Scouts in the 2010 Portland lawsuit. As part of the report, they emphasized the files' success in preventing pedophiles from entering Scouting ranks, but acknowledged the organization's failure to stop some abusers.

"In some instances we failed to defend Scouts from those who would do them harm," the Scouts said in a statement accompanying the report. "There have been instances where people misused their positions in Scouting to abuse children, and in certain cases, our response to these incidents and our efforts to protect youth were plainly insufficient, inappropriate, or wrong."

Warren's report found that, of 930 files created between January 1965 and June 1984, there were 1,622 victims. Of the total victims, at least 1,302 were involved in Scouting.

"My review of these files indicates that the reported rate of sexual abuse in Scouting has been very low," Warren wrote in the report.

Warren compared the rate of victimization in the Scouts ? about 1.4 to 2.1 youth per 100,000 ? to the nationally-reported incidence of child abuse by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which found that in 1980, 70 per 100,000 children experience sexual exploitation each year.

Warren's analysis didn't account for the fact that files were destroyed for offenders who died or turned 75 years old, something she said didn't affect her overall conclusions.

Critics contend the organization's legal battles reflect a long-standing effort to protect the Boy Scouts' reputation, and to try to limit any lawsuits.

"It's a culture of denial and concealment," said Timothy Kosnoff, a Seattle attorney who in 2006 obtained documents on 5,200 alleged pedophiles who went into the files from 1949-2005.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2012-10-01-Boy%20Scout%20Files/id-98445e3a2d964e15938d362c7f1a70e7

Jordyn Wieber michael phelps Kerri Strug Ledecky Nadia Comaneci Rebecca Soni Snoop Lion

The River Journal - Education Referendums on November Ballot

A look at the citizen propositions regarding education

The legislature passed three major education reform bills in 2011 that are being challenged by opponents of the legislation through three different referendums (propositions) that will be before the voters to accept or reject in the November 6 general election.

Proposition 1 is a ?referendum to approve or reject legislation limiting negotiated agreements between teachers and local school boards and ending the practice of issuing renewable contracts.?

Proposition 1 refers to Senate Bill 1108 (S1108) passed in the 2011 legislative session that ?relates to labor relations and employee entitlements.? Some of the provisions in S1108 include:

Phasing out tenure for all teachers not covered by tenure provisions upon passage of the legislation and replacing it with one- or two-year teaching contracts.

Providing for parent feedback in evaluating teacher performance.

Eliminating the 99 percent average daily attendance protection feature of the state funding formula and replacing it with a 10 percent severance fee for positions eliminated because of decreased enrollment.

Limiting the length of negotiated labor agreements to one year.

Limiting collective bargaining to just salaries and benefits.

Requiring that all labor negotiations be conducted in public meetings.

Proposition 2 is a ?referendum to approve or reject legislation providing teacher performance pay based on state-mandated test scores, student performance, hard-to-fill positions and leadership.?

Proposition 2 refers to Senate Bill 1110 (S1110) passed in the 2011 legislative session that instituted a ?pay for performance system.? The plan ?rewards teachers and administrators on a school wide basis for student achievement as determined by academic growth. Local districts will also reward schools based on growth as determined at the local level. Teachers may also be rewarded for teaching in hard to fill positions and for taking on leadership roles such as mentoring, creating curriculum, grant writing and obtaining National Board Certification.?

Proposition 3 refers to Senate Bill 1184 (S1184) and relates to ?public school modernization and reform.? S1184 ?re-prioritizes statutory requirements to strategically invest in Idaho?s educators and technology, and increases transparency for Idaho?s public school system.? S1184 provides requirements for ?implementation of online courses, one-to-one mobile computing devices (laptop computers) and other advanced technology in the classroom.?

S1184 ?provides high school teachers with mobile computing devices first in the rollout beginning with the 2012-2013 school year. Provides one-third of high school students access to mobile computing devices beginning with the 2013-2014 school year until all students have access to such devices by 2015-2016.? The legislation also ?requires the State Board of Education to create digital citizenship standards, and to consider adding online courses as a graduation requirement for the class of 2016.?

These are controversial propositions and supporters and opponents are expected to conduct extensive campaigns supporting the continued implementation of the 2011 legislation or rejecting any one or all three of the controversial pieces of legislation.

Changes in the legislation, including funding provisions and online credit requirements, have been addressed by the 2012 Legislature and the State Board of Education but continuing opposition to the 2011 legislation still exists, resulting in opponents being successful in obtaining enough signatures qualifying the three referendums to be placed before the voters for their approval or rejection in the November 6 general election.

The legislation represents major changes in public school policy and I encourage voters to obtain as much information as possible on the pros and cons of the referendums before voting on November 6. A ?YES? vote on the ballot will mean that you approve the legislation as passed by the 2011 Legislature and a ?NO? vote means you reject the legislation passed by the 2011 Legislature.

Thanks for reading and as always please feel free to contact me with questions relating to this article or other issues important to you. I can be reached by phone at (208) 265-0123, by mail at P.O. Box 112, Dover, 83825 or by email at geskridge(at)coldreams.com.?

Source: http://riverjournal.com/vivvo/features/politics/2535-lunalaws_seatinthehouse_eskridge_092012.html

shea weber greystone sidney crosby at the drive in alternative minimum tax modeselektor gran torino